Export limit exceeded: 24495 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24495 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-26485 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 7 Firefox, Firefox Focus, Firefox Mobile and 4 more | 2026-08-19 | 8.8 High |
| Removing an XSLT parameter during processing could have lead to an exploitable use-after-free. We have had reports of attacks in the wild abusing this flaw. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 97.0.2, Firefox ESR < 91.6.1, Firefox for Android < 97.3.0, Thunderbird < 91.6.2, and Focus < 97.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-26486 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 7 Firefox, Firefox Focus, Firefox Mobile and 4 more | 2026-08-19 | 9.6 Critical |
| An unexpected message in the WebGPU IPC framework could lead to a use-after-free and exploitable sandbox escape. We have had reports of attacks in the wild abusing this flaw. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 97.0.2, Firefox ESR < 91.6.1, Firefox for Android < 97.3.0, Thunderbird < 91.6.2, and Focus < 97.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29533 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 10 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Firefox Mobile and 7 more | 2026-08-19 | 4.3 Medium |
| A website could have obscured the fullscreen notification by using a combination of <code>window.open</code>, fullscreen requests, <code>window.name</code> assignments, and <code>setInterval</code> calls. This could have led to user confusion and possible spoofing attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 112, Focus for Android < 112, Firefox ESR < 102.10, Firefox for Android < 112, and Thunderbird < 102.10. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29535 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 10 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Firefox Mobile and 7 more | 2026-08-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| Following a Garbage Collector compaction, weak maps may have been accessed before they were correctly traced. This resulted in memory corruption and a potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 112, Focus for Android < 112, Firefox ESR < 102.10, Firefox for Android < 112, and Thunderbird < 102.10. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29536 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 10 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Firefox Mobile and 7 more | 2026-08-19 | 8.8 High |
| An attacker could cause the memory manager to incorrectly free a pointer that addresses attacker-controlled memory, resulting in an assertion, memory corruption, or a potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 112, Focus for Android < 112, Firefox ESR < 102.10, Firefox for Android < 112, and Thunderbird < 102.10. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29539 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 10 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Firefox Mobile and 7 more | 2026-08-19 | 8.8 High |
| When handling the filename directive in the Content-Disposition header, the filename would be truncated if the filename contained a NULL character. This could have led to reflected file download attacks potentially tricking users to install malware. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 112, Focus for Android < 112, Firefox ESR < 102.10, Firefox for Android < 112, and Thunderbird < 102.10. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29541 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 10 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Firefox Mobile and 7 more | 2026-08-19 | 8.8 High |
| Firefox did not properly handle downloads of files ending in <code>.desktop</code>, which can be interpreted to run attacker-controlled commands. <br>*This bug only affects Firefox for Linux on certain Distributions. Other operating systems are unaffected, and Mozilla is unable to enumerate all affected Linux Distributions.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 112, Focus for Android < 112, Firefox ESR < 102.10, Firefox for Android < 112, and Thunderbird < 102.10. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29548 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 10 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Firefox Mobile and 7 more | 2026-08-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| A wrong lowering instruction in the ARM64 Ion compiler resulted in a wrong optimization result. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 112, Focus for Android < 112, Firefox ESR < 102.10, Firefox for Android < 112, and Thunderbird < 102.10. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29550 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 10 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Firefox Mobile and 7 more | 2026-08-19 | 8.8 High |
| Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 111 and Firefox ESR 102.9. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 112, Focus for Android < 112, Firefox ESR < 102.10, Firefox for Android < 112, and Thunderbird < 102.10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21710 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 4 Node.js, Nodejs, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-08-19 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw in Node.js HTTP request handling causes an uncaught `TypeError` when a request is received with a header named `__proto__` and the application accesses `req.headersDistinct`. When this occurs, `dest["__proto__"]` resolves to `Object.prototype` rather than `undefined`, causing `.push()` to be called on a non-array. This exception is thrown synchronously inside a property getter and cannot be intercepted by `error` event listeners, meaning it cannot be handled without wrapping every `req.headersDistinct` access in a `try/catch`. * This vulnerability affects all Node.js HTTP servers on **20.x, 22.x, 24.x, and v25.x** | ||||
| CVE-2026-64611 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-08-19 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in libcupsfilters. The cfIEEE1284NormalizeMakeModel() function enters an infinite loop when processing a printer-advertised IEEE-1284 device ID with an empty model field, causing sustained CPU consumption. A network-adjacent attacker could exploit this by broadcasting a specially crafted printer advertisement, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18739 | 2 Popt-devel, Redhat | 4 Popt-static, Enterprise Linux, Hummingbird and 1 more | 2026-08-19 | 2.5 Low |
| A flaw was found in popt, a command-line option parsing library. An off-by-one error in the poptStuffArgs function, when repeatedly called by a host application or through deep alias nesting, can lead to corruption of internal program data. This corruption could potentially enable a local attacker to execute arbitrary code if the host application then unsafely processes the altered data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3884 | 1 Redhat | 19 Amq Streams, Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Keycloak and 16 more | 2026-08-19 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow that can cause remote denial of service attacks. When the server uses the FormEncodedDataDefinition.doParse(StreamSourceChannel) method to parse large form data encoding with application/x-www-form-urlencoded, the method will cause an OutOfMemory issue. This flaw allows unauthorized users to cause a remote denial of service (DoS) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23366 | 1 Redhat | 4 Hal Management Console, Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2026-08-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the HAL Console in the Wildfly component, which does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output used as a web page that is served to other users. The attacker must be authenticated as a user that belongs to management groups “SuperUser”, “Admin”, or “Maintainer”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17048 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 4 more | 2026-08-18 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak Admin REST API, which is used to manage security realms and clients. The issue occurs when the system processes requests for rotated client secrets that are stored in a secure vault. Due to improper boundary enforcement, a delegated administrator with view-only permissions can retrieve the actual resolved secret instead of the vault placeholder, leading to the exposure of sensitive credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13476 | 7 Canonical, Hp, Ibm and 4 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Hp-ux, Aix and 6 more | 2026-08-18 | 7.3 High |
| IBM Informix Dynamic Server 14.10, 15.0, and 12.10 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with service account privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2603 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 3 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-08-18 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote attacker could bypass security controls by sending a valid SAML response from an external Identity Provider (IdP) to the Keycloak SAML endpoint for IdP-initiated broker logins. This allows the attacker to complete broker logins even when the SAML Identity Provider is disabled, leading to unauthorized authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75032 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-08-18 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in BlueZ. Insufficient validation of packet length fields in GetFolderItems responses within the Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) implementation allows a malicious Bluetooth device within range to cause an out-of-bounds memory read. This vulnerability, affecting the parse_media_element() and parse_media_folder() functions, can lead to a crash of the bluetoothd daemon, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). It could also potentially expose sensitive heap memory contents. Exploitation requires user interaction to pair with the malicious device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2366 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 3 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-08-18 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authorization bypass vulnerability in the Keycloak Admin API allows any authenticated user, even those without administrative privileges, to enumerate the organization memberships of other users. This information disclosure occurs if the attacker knows the victim's unique identifier (UUID) and the Organizations feature is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3429 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 6 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 3 more | 2026-08-18 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was identified in the Account REST API of Keycloak that allows a user authenticated at a lower security level to perform sensitive actions intended only for higher-assurance sessions. Specifically, an attacker who has already obtained a victim’s password can delete the victim’s registered MFA/OTP credential without first proving possession of that factor. The attacker can then register their own MFA device, effectively taking full control of the account. This weakness undermines the intended protection provided by multi-factor authentication. | ||||