Export limit exceeded: 418961 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 418961 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 418961 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (418961 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-115293 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data (CWE-201) in Kibana Observability onboarding can lead to disclosure of the credentials that Kibana uses to connect to Elasticsearch. When these credentials are embedded in the Elasticsearch host URLs in the Kibana configuration, an authenticated user with the privileges to onboard Observability data can obtain them. The user can then access Elasticsearch directly with the privileges of the Kibana service account, which are outside the privileges granted to that user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115294 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-11-03 | 7.3 High |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (CWE-22) in the Kibana Fleet feature can lead to unauthorized resource deletion via Path Traversal (CAPEC-126). A low-privileged user with Fleet agent policies write access could cause a subsequent administrative action to act on unintended resources. This can result in the deletion of resources such as Kibana spaces and other organizational assets that the low-privileged user cannot delete directly. Exploitation requires an administrator to interact with the affected Fleet interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46487 | 2026-11-03 | 7.5 High | ||
| GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 4.0.0-alpha.1 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, the Elasticsearch-backed search proxy can skip GeoNetwork's access-control filter injection when a client request has an omitted query field. The request is then forwarded to Elasticsearch without group visibility, draft exclusion, record ownership, or portal-specific filtering. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use the affected public search API to retrieve the full indexed contents of metadata records that should not be publicly visible. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119728 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the H.264 video parser in gst-plugins-bad. When processing a specially crafted H.264 video file with malformed Multiview (MVC) Sequence Parameter Set data, the parser can dereference a NULL pointer during the cleanup of partially allocated internal structures after a parse failure. This can cause the application using GStreamer to crash, resulting in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112437 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-11-03 | 7.8 High |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to gain root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82976 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-11-03 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in the image-customization-controller used in OpenShift's bare metal provisioning stack. The controller registers an HTTP file server on port 8084 with no authentication. The custom imageFileSystem implementation exposes a browsable HTML directory listing of all registered images at the root path. The only access control on per-host images is the random UUID filename; the directory listing discloses those UUIDs to any caller on the provisioning network. Each served image embeds an Ignition config containing the base64-encoded cluster pull secret, optional IRONIC_RAMDISK_SSH_KEY, proxy settings, and per-host NetworkManager keyfiles. An adjacent network attacker can enumerate all image UUIDs via directory listing, download any image, extract the embedded Ignition config, and recover the cluster pull secret and SSH key. ### Evidence **pkg/imagehandler/imagefilesystem.go — root directory is browsable and enumerates all UUID image names** ```go func (f *imageFileSystem) Readdir(n int) ([]fs.FileInfo, error) { f.mu.Lock() defer f.mu.Unlock() result := []fs.FileInfo{} for _, im := range f.images { result = append(result, im) } return result, nil } func (f *imageFileSystem) Open(name string) (http.File, error) { f.log.Info("Open", "path", name) if name == "/" { return f, nil } ... ``` **cmd/controller/main.go — file server bound on all interfaces without auth or TLS** ```go http.Handle("/", http.FileServer(imageServer.FileSystem())) go func() { server := &http.Server{ Addr: imagesBindAddr, // default ":8084" ReadHeaderTimeout: 5 * time.Second, } err := server.ListenAndServe() ``` **pkg/ignition/service_config.go:94-100 — pull secret is embedded in every served image** ```go func (b *ignitionBuilder) authFile() ignition_config_types_32.File { source := "data:;base64," + strings.TrimSpace(b.ironicAgentPullSecret) return ignition_config_types_32.File{ Node: ignition_config_types_32.Node{Path: "/etc/authfile.json"}, ... ``` ### Attack Pattern Adjacent provisioning-network client → GET / lists UUID image names → download ISO/initramfs → extract embedded Ignition → recover cluster pull secret and SSH key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5419 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 13 Gnutls, Cert Manager, Discovery and 10 more | 2026-11-03 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. The PKCS#7 padding check, performed during decryption, was not constant-time. This timing side-channel could allow a remote attacker to potentially leak sensitive information about the padding bytes through observable timing differences. This vulnerability is a form of information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92615 | 1 Redhat | 4 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Edge Manager and 1 more | 2026-11-03 | 6.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in flightctl. The configureRepoHTTPSClient() function in the device-render worker builds a per-repository tls.Config (which may include InsecureSkipVerify, a custom CA bundle, or tenant-supplied mTLS client certificates) and installs it into go-git's process-global client.Protocols map via gitclient.InstallProtocol("https", ...). Because the worker renders devices for multiple organizations concurrently from a shared goroutine pool, whichever tenant's repository configuration is written last wins for all in-flight git.Clone calls. This race condition can cause one tenant's TLS settings, including InsecureSkipVerify or mTLS client credentials, to leak into another tenant's git operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18107 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-11-03 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in CRIU's handling of restartable sequences (rseq) during checkpoint/restore. A malicious process inside a container can register an rseq critical section that hijacks CRIU's parasite code injection during checkpoint, allowing it to spoof the process credentials saved in the checkpoint image. On restore, the container process gains elevated capabilities and zeroed UIDs/GIDs. The practical impact on Red Hat products is limited by several factors: checkpoint/restore requires root privileges (podman) or cluster-admin RBAC (OpenShift) to trigger and cannot be initiated from within the container itself; on OpenShift prior to 4.17 the feature required explicit opt-in, and on 4.17+ the kubelet checkpoint API RBAC is not configured by default; OpenShift enforces user namespaces by default for regular workloads (hostUsers is gated behind admin-only SCCs), which makes the spoofed capabilities namespace-scoped and ineffective for privilege escalation; SELinux type enforcement (container_t) blocks privilege transitions independently of capabilities; seccomp filters persist through checkpoint/restore and cannot be corrupted via the parasite; and kernel mount namespace ownership checks on RHEL 9/10 kernels prevent mount-based container escape even with spoofed capabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101434 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise Peopletools | 2026-11-03 | 7.6 High |
| Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Database Server). Supported versions that are affected are 8.61-8.63. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data and unauthorized read access to a subset of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.6 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-112693 | 1 Apple | 6 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 3 more | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| A use-after-free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in Safari 27.2, iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, visionOS 27.2. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to an unexpected Safari crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112695 | 1 Apple | 6 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 3 more | 2026-11-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| A use-after-free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in Safari 27.2, iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, visionOS 27.2. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to an unexpected process termination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107027 | 2026-11-03 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Insecure permissions in lz233 Tarnhelm v1.8.2 (versionCode 20250630) allows unauthorized attackers to invoke an exported component, leading to arbitrary data access and overwriting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107043 | 2026-11-03 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Insecure permissions in Code Catcher versionCode 131 allow unauthorized attackers to arbitrarily manipulate the app's SMS-code-capture mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107048 | 1 Motionui | 1 Motionui-android | 2026-11-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in the WebView rendering path component of MotionCreative Motion UI versionCode 101 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via supplying a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107059 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud | 2026-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in Nextcloud versionCode 30390190 allows attackers to force victim users to logout of their accounts and switch to an attacker controlled progile, bypassing authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109594 | 2026-11-03 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Post-authentication Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the End-of-Life SonicWall GMS 9.5.2 and earlier versions which in specific conditions could potentially allow an authenticated attacker to access or modify information stored in the GMS database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12944 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 9.6 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 can allow attackers to execute arbitrary Python code with root privileges (UID=0) on the Langflow server by submitting components containing socket or urllib imports. This enables: (1) AWS credential theft via IMDSv1 SSRF with full IAM role permissions, (2) arbitrary file exfiltration from the container filesystem, and (3) lateral movement to internal services (PostgreSQL, Redis) within the Docker network. The scanner incorrectly returns "validated": true, providing a false security signal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12767 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12766 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||