| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The AffiliateX – Amazon Affiliate Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the save_customization_settings AJAX action in versions 1.0.0 to 1.3.9.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to store arbitrary JavaScript that executes whenever an AffiliateX block renders on the site. |
| A low-privileged user is able to obtain information about tasks executed on devices controlled by Proget MDM (Mobile Device Management), as well as details of the devices like their UUIDs needed for exploitation of CVE-2025-1416.
In order to perform the attack, one has to know a task_id, but since it's a low integer and there is no limit of requests an attacker can perform to a vulnerable endpoint, the task_id might be simply brute forced.
This issue has been fixed in 2.17.5 version of Konsola Proget (server part of the MDM suite). |
| In Proget MDM, a low-privileged user can retrieve passwords for managed devices and subsequently use functionalities restricted by the MDM (Mobile Device Management). For it to happen, they must know the UUIDs of targetted devices, which might be obtained by exploiting CVE-2025-1415 or CVE-2025-1417.
This issue has been fixed in 2.17.5 version of Konsola Proget (server part of the MDM suite). |
| In Proget MDM, a low-privileged user can access information about changes contained in backups of all devices managed by the MDM (Mobile Device Management). This information include user ids, email addresses, first names, last names and device UUIDs. The last one can be used for exploitation of CVE-2025-1416.
Successful exploitation requires UUID of a targeted backup, which cannot be brute forced.
This issue has been fixed in 2.17.5 version of Konsola Proget (server part of the MDM suite). |
| When frontend.enableExecuteMultiOperation is enabled, the server can apply namespace-scoped validation and feature gates for the embedded StartWorkflowExecutionRequest using its Namespace field rather than the outer, authorized ExecuteMultiOperationRequest.Namespace. This allows a caller authorized for one namespace to bypass that namespace's limits/policies by setting the embedded start request's namespace to a different namespace. The workflow is still created in the outer (authorized) namespace; only validation/gating is performed under the wrong namespace context.
This issue affects Temporal: from 1.24.0 through 1.29.1. Fixed in 1.27.4, 1.28.2, 1.29.2. |
| When system.enableCrossNamespaceCommands is enabled (on by default), the Temporal server permits certain workflow task commands (e.g. StartChildWorkflowExecution, SignalExternalWorkflowExecution, RequestCancelExternalWorkflowExecution) to target a different namespace than the namespace authorized at the gRPC boundary. The frontend authorizes RespondWorkflowTaskCompleted based on the outer request namespace, but the history service later resolves and executes the command using the namespace embedded in command attributes without authorizing the caller for that target namespace. This can allow a worker authorized for one namespace to create, signal, or cancel workflows in another namespace.
This issue affects Temporal: through 1.29.1. Fixed in 1.27.4, 1.28.2, 1.29.2. |
| An access control vulnerability was discovered in the Request Trace and Download Trace functionalities of CMC before 25.1.0 due to a specific access restriction not being properly enforced for users with limited privileges. An authenticated user with limited privileges can request and download trace files due to improper access restrictions, potentially exposing unauthorized network data. |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), Missing Authorization vulnerability in Innorix WP allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Innorix WP from All versions If the "exam" directory exists under the directory where the product is installed (ex: innorix/exam) |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Industrial Ethernet Switch Device Manager (DM) of Cisco IOS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of authorizations for authenticated users. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to privilege level 15.
To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials for a user account with privilege level 5 or higher. Read-only DM users are assigned privilege level 5. |
| BCryptPasswordEncoder.matches(CharSequence,String) will incorrectly return true for passwords larger than 72 characters as long as the first 72 characters are the same. |
| SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java allows an attacker to access an endpoint that can disclose information about deployed server components, including their XML definitions. This information should ideally be restricted to customer administrators, even though they may not need it. These XML files are not entirely SAP-internal as they are deployed with the server. In such a scenario, sensitive information could be exposed without compromising its integrity or availability. |
| The ABAP Build Framework in SAP ABAP Platform allows an authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to a specific transaction. By executing the add-on build functionality within the ABAP Build Framework, an attacker could call the transaction and view its details. This has a limited impact on the confidentiality of the application with no effect on the integrity and availability of the application. |
| When pglogical attempts to replicate data, it does not verify it is using a replication connection, which means a user with CONNECT access to a database configured for replication can execute the pglogical command to obtain read access to replicated tables. When pglogical runs it should verify it is running on a replication connection but does not perform this check. This vulnerability was introduced in the pglogical 3.x codebase, which is proprietary to EDB. The same code base has been integrated into BDR/PGD 4 and 5.
To exploit the vulnerability the attacker needs at least CONNECT permissions to a database configured for replication and must understand a number of pglogical3/BDR specific commands and be able to decode the binary protocol. |
| SAP Just In Time(JIT) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing attacker to escalate privileges that would otherwise be restricted, potentially causing a low impact on the integrity of the application.Confidentiality and Availability are not impacted. |
| OData Service in Manage Purchasing Info Records does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing an attacker to escalate privileges. This has low impact on integrity of the application. |
| Due to missing authorization check, SAP NetWeaver (ABAP Class Builder) allows an attacker to gain higher access levels than they should have, resulting in escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation, this could result in disclosure of highly sensitive information. It could also have a high impact on the integrity and availability of the application. |
| The agent in Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) before 14.0.97 and 14.1.x before 14.1.19 potentially allows privilege escalation on managed systems. |
| The eDocument Cockpit (Inbound NF-e) in SAP Electronic Invoicing for Brazil allows an authenticated attacker with certain privileges to gain unauthorized access to each transaction. By executing the specific ABAP method within the ABAP system, an unauthorized attacker could call each transaction and view the inbound delivery details. This vulnerability has a low impact on the confidentiality with no effect on the integrity and the availability of the application. |
| This vulnerability exists in the CAP back office application due to improper authorization checks on certain API endpoints. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating API request URL to gain unauthorized access to other user accounts. |
| Due to a missing authorization check, an authenticated attacker could upload a file as a template for solution documentation in SAP Solution Manager 7.1. After successful exploitation, an attacker can cause limited impact on the integrity and availability of the application. |
