| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered on Marbella KR8s Dashcam FF 2.0.8 devices. Once access is gained either by default, common, or cracked passwords, the video recordings (containing sensitive routes, conversations, and footage) are open for downloading by creating a socket to command port 7777, and then downloading video via port 7778 and audio via port 7779. |
| The Cloudflare Vite plugin enables a full-featured integration between Vite and the Workers runtime. When utilising the Cloudflare Vite plugin in its default configuration, all files are exposed by the local dev server, including files in the root directory that contain secret information such as .env and .dev.vars. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.0. |
| Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to August 2025 Cloud-Hosted Flowise, an authenticated vulnerability in Flowise Cloud allows any user on the free tier to access sensitive environment variables from other tenants via the Custom JavaScript Function node. This includes secrets such as OpenAI API keys, AWS credentials, Supabase tokens, and Google Cloud secrets — resulting in a full cross-tenant data exposure. This issue has been patched in the August 2025 Cloud-Hosted Flowise. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can enumerate valid user names from an unprotected endpoint. |
| The Bare Metal Operator (BMO) implements a Kubernetes API for managing bare metal hosts in Metal3. Baremetal Operator enables users to load Secret from arbitrary namespaces upon deployment of the namespace scoped Custom Resource `BMCEventSubscription`. Prior to versions 0.8.1 and 0.9.1, an adversary Kubernetes account with only namespace level roles (e.g. a tenant controlling a namespace) may create a `BMCEventSubscription` in his authorized namespace and then load Secrets from his unauthorized namespaces to his authorized namespace via the Baremetal Operator, causing Secret Leakage. The patch makes BMO refuse to read Secrets from other namespace than where the corresponding BMH resource is. The patch does not change the `BMCEventSubscription` API in BMO, but stricter validation will fail the request at admission time. It will also prevent the controller reading such Secrets, in case the BMCES CR has already been deployed. The issue exists for all versions of BMO, and is patched in BMO releases v0.9.1 and v0.8.1. Prior upgrading to patched BMO version, duplicate any existing Secret pointed to by `BMCEventSubscription`'s `httpHeadersRef` to the same namespace where the corresponding BMH exists. After upgrade, remove the old Secrets. As a workaround, the operator can configure BMO RBAC to be namespace scoped, instead of cluster scoped, to prevent BMO from accessing Secrets from other namespaces, and/or use `WATCH_NAMESPACE` configuration option to limit BMO to single namespace. |
| Post-Quantum Secure Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing provides a Python implementation of Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing (VSS) scheme. In versions 0.8.0b2 and prior, the `feldman_vss` library contains timing side-channel vulnerabilities in its matrix operations, specifically within the `_find_secure_pivot` function and potentially other parts of `_secure_matrix_solve`. These vulnerabilities are due to Python's execution model, which does not guarantee constant-time execution. An attacker with the ability to measure the execution time of these functions (e.g., through repeated calls with carefully crafted inputs) could potentially recover secret information used in the Verifiable Secret Sharing (VSS) scheme. The `_find_secure_pivot` function, used during Gaussian elimination in `_secure_matrix_solve`, attempts to find a non-zero pivot element. However, the conditional statement `if matrix[row][col] != 0 and row_random < min_value:` has execution time that depends on the value of `matrix[row][col]`. This timing difference can be exploited by an attacker. The `constant_time_compare` function in this file also does not provide a constant-time guarantee. The Python implementation of matrix operations in the _find_secure_pivot and _secure_matrix_solve functions cannot guarantee constant-time execution, potentially leaking information about secret polynomial coefficients. An attacker with the ability to make precise timing measurements of these operations could potentially extract secret information through statistical analysis of execution times, though practical exploitation would require significant expertise and controlled execution environments. Successful exploitation of these timing side-channels could allow an attacker to recover secret keys or other sensitive information protected by the VSS scheme. This could lead to a complete compromise of the shared secret. As of time of publication, no patched versions of Post-Quantum Secure Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing exist, but other mitigations are available. As acknowledged in the library's documentation, these vulnerabilities cannot be adequately addressed in pure Python. In the short term, consider using this library only in environments where timing measurements by attackers are infeasible. In the medium term, implement your own wrappers around critical operations using constant-time libraries in languages like Rust, Go, or C. In the long term, wait for the planned Rust implementation mentioned in the library documentation that will properly address these issues. |
| A flaw was found in the Tempo Operator. When the Jaeger UI Monitor Tab functionality is enabled in a Tempo instance managed by the Tempo Operator, the Operator creates a ClusterRoleBinding for the Service Account of the Tempo instance to grant the cluster-monitoring-view ClusterRole.
This can be exploited if a user has 'create' permissions on TempoStack and 'get' permissions on Secret in a namespace (for example, a user has ClusterAdmin permissions for a specific namespace), as the user can read the token of the Tempo service account and therefore has access to see all cluster metrics. |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in the component /socket.io/1/websocket/ of Soundcraft Ui Series Model(s) Ui12 and Ui16 Firmware v1.0.7x and v1.0.5x allows attackers to access Administrator credentials in plaintext. |
| A flaw was found in Tempo Operator, where it creates a ServiceAccount, ClusterRole, and ClusterRoleBinding when a user deploys a TempoStack or TempoMonolithic instance. This flaw allows a user with full access to their namespace to extract the ServiceAccount token and use it to submit TokenReview and SubjectAccessReview requests, potentially revealing information about other users' permissions. While this does not allow privilege escalation or impersonation, it exposes information that could aid in gathering information for further attacks. |
| In ESPEC North America Web Controller 3 before 3.3.4, /api/v4/auth/ with any invalid authentication request results in exposing a JWT secret. This allows for elevated permissions to the UI. |
| Improper input validation in the component /kafka/ui/serdes/CustomSerdeLoader.java of kafka-ui v0.6.0 to v0.7.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via supplying crafted data. |
| Timing difference in password reset in Ergon Informatik AG's Airlock IAM 7.7.9, 8.0.8, 8.1.7, 8.2.4 and 8.3.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate usernames. |
| A vulnerability in the legacy chat component of Mitel MiContact Center Business through 10.2.0.3 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct an information disclosure attack due to improper handling of session data. A successful exploit requires user interaction and could allow an attacker to access sensitive information, leading to unauthorized access to active chat rooms, reading chat data, and sending messages during an active chat session. |
| Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor for some Edge Orchestrator software before version 24.11.1 for Intel(R) Tiber(TM) Edge Platform may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access. |
| An Improper Input Validation in certain UniFi Access devices could allow a Command Injection by a malicious actor with access to UniFi Access management network.
Affected Products:
UniFi Access Reader Pro (Version 2.14.21 and earlier)
UniFi Access G2 Reader Pro (Version 1.10.32 and earlier)
UniFi Access G3 Reader Pro (Version 1.10.30 and earlier)
UniFi Access Intercom (Version 1.7.28 and earlier)
UniFi Access G3 Intercom (Version 1.7.29 and earlier)
UniFi Access Intercom Viewer (Version 1.3.20 and earlier)
Mitigation:
Update UniFi Access Reader Pro Version 2.15.9 or later
Update UniFi Access G2 Reader Pro Version 1.11.23 or later
Update UniFi Access G3 Reader Pro Version 1.11.22 or later
Update UniFi Access Intercom Version 1.8.22 or later
Update UniFi Access G3 Intercom Version 1.8.22 or later
Update UniFi Access Intercom Viewer Version 1.4.39 or later |
| An Improper Input Validation in EdgeMAX EdgeSwitch (Version 1.10.4 and earlier) could allow a Command Injection by a malicious actor with access to EdgeSwitch adjacent network. |
| AssetView and AssetView CLOUD contain an issue with acquiring sensitive information from sent data to the developer. If exploited, sensitive information may be obtained by a remote unauthenticated attacker. |
| Vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation DiscussionTools.This issue affects DiscussionTools: from * before 1.43.4, 1.44.1. |
| Anyquery is an SQL query engine built on top of SQLite. Versions 0.4.3 and below allow attackers who have already gained access to localhost, even with low privileges, to use the http server through the port unauthenticated, and access private integration data like emails, without any warning of a foreign login from the provider. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.4. |
| Improper input validation in some firmware for some Intel(R) Graphics Drivers and Intel LTS kernels within Ring 1: Device Drivers may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
