Export limit exceeded: 403805 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24495 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-84644 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. The Thycotic Secret Server external credential plugin passes a user-supplied server URL to its SDK without validating the scheme, host, or IP range, and the plugin backend is executed synchronously within the automation controller web process. Using the external credential test endpoint, a user who holds only the use role on such a credential can override the stored server URL with an arbitrary internal address, causing the control plane to issue requests to internal services. Although the response is a generic error, response timing reveals whether internal hosts and ports are reachable, enabling internal network reconnaissance and a blind request-forgery primitive from the control plane, and each request can hold a web worker, affecting availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84680 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 4.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. When attaching a Galaxy or Automation Hub credential to an organization through the galaxy_credentials relationship endpoint, the controller verifies only that the requesting user can read the credential, rather than that they hold use permission on it, unlike other credential consumption in the product. An authenticated user who administers one organization and has read-only visibility of a credential in another organization -- for example a platform auditor -- can bind that foreign credential to their own organization. On the next project synchronization the controller decrypts the credential server-side and uses its token to authenticate to the credential owner's Automation Hub, allowing cross-tenant use of another organization's secret. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84684 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 9.6 Critical |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. When attaching a source inventory to a constructed inventory through the input_inventories relationship endpoint, the controller verifies only that the requesting user can read the source inventory, rather than that they hold use permission on it, unlike instance group attachment on the same access class. An authenticated user who can administer a constructed inventory and has read-only visibility of an inventory in another organization -- for example an organization or system auditor -- can attach that foreign inventory as an input. On synchronization the controller clones every host and host variable, including secrets, into the attacker's inventory, and because the attacker administers the constructed inventory they can run ad hoc commands against the cloned hosts, resulting in cross-tenant disclosure of inventory data and secrets and code execution against another tenant's managed hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84686 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 7.6 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. Notification template password fields are encrypted with a key derived from the secret key, the object primary key, and the field name, but not the subfield name, and the API returns the full ciphertext of a password subfield after the notification type is changed to one that does not define that subfield. A user with administrative access to a single notification template, but without any wider privilege, can switch the template type to reveal the stored ciphertext, replant that ciphertext into a webhook password field pointing at a server they control, and trigger a test notification. The controller decrypts the replayed ciphertext to the original plaintext and sends it to the attacker's server in an HTTP Basic authorization header, allowing recovery of Slack, PagerDuty, Twilio, AWS SNS, and Grafana credentials the administrator was only permitted to use, not read. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84689 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 8.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. The bulk job launch endpoint builds workflow job nodes from client input using a serializer that leaves the node's job reference -- a field normally set by the workflow task manager after it spawns a child job -- writable and does not include it in the permission validation performed for the other node fields. An authenticated user with permission to execute a single job template can submit a bulk job launch whose node references the identifier of any unified job in any organization, including jobs they cannot access. The node then exposes that job's metadata, and cancelling the attacker's workflow cancels the referenced job through the workflow cancellation cascade, without any per-job authorization check. Repeated, this allows a low-privileged user to cancel running jobs, project and inventory syncs, ad hoc commands, and system jobs across all organizations, denying automation service platform-wide. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84692 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 8.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. The execute-permission check on a workflow job template node's unified job template is skipped when the node's currently stored unified job template is empty: the check inspects only the existing value, not the incoming one, and a node can be created without a unified job template. An authenticated user who holds admin permission on a single workflow job template can create an empty node and then patch it to reference any job template, project, inventory source, system job, or workflow on the platform -- including ones in other organizations that they cannot otherwise read or launch. Running their own workflow then executes the victim template with the victim's attached credentials, inventory and project, resulting in cross-organization privilege escalation to arbitrary automation execution. The patch response also discloses the victim template's name and description. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84703 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. When creating or editing an execution environment, the controller does not verify that the requesting user has use permission on the container registry credential referenced by the execution environment; it validates only the organization and the credential kind. An authenticated user who is an execution-environment admin of one organization can associate a container registry credential belonging to a different organization -- one they cannot otherwise read, list, or use -- to an execution environment they control. When a job runs with that execution environment, the controller decrypts the foreign credential's registry password and supplies it to the container runtime, disclosing another organization's registry credentials across the tenant boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84707 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. The host_filter query parameter on the hosts list API is parsed into a raw Django ORM filter whose lookup path is validated only against a sensitive-field blocklist, with no authorization check on the database relations it traverses. Because job event and ad-hoc command output fields are not on that blocklist, an authenticated user holding only the Read role on an inventory can construct filters that traverse into the output of jobs they have no permission to view and use the returned host count as a boolean oracle. Using regular-expression lookups, the attacker can extract, character by character, the output (which routinely contains plaintext credentials, tokens, and command results) of jobs and ad-hoc commands belonging to other organizations, resulting in cross-tenant disclosure of job output | ||||
| CVE-2026-84708 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. A user with the delegated Instance Group Admin role on a container group can set a free-form pod specification override that is deep-merged, without filtering, into every job pod launched on that group. The only hardening applied is forcing automountServiceAccountToken to false, which does not remove an explicitly declared projected serviceAccountToken volume or secret volume mounts. A non-superuser can therefore cause the kubelet to mint a ServiceAccount token for the control-plane automation-controller service account into the job container and mount arbitrary secrets from the control-plane namespace, obtaining the control-plane service-account identity on the Kubernetes API and cleartext control-plane secrets (including the platform database password and Django SECRET_KEY), leading to full platform data compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84709 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. When a custom credential type is created or updated, the injector configuration is validated by rendering each attacker-supplied Jinja2 template synchronously inside the web request worker, with no limit on iteration count, output size, or execution time. An authenticated superuser can submit a credential type whose injector contains deeply nested loops or large string operations, consuming CPU and wall-clock time in the web worker until it is killed by the request timeout; issuing enough concurrent requests places all web workers into a kill-and-respawn loop, making the Controller API and UI unavailable for the duration of the attack. Additionally, certain template constructs raise exception types that the validator does not handle, resulting in an unhandled server error (HTTP 500) instead of a clean validation error. The rendering sandbox prevents code execution, so there is no confidentiality or integrity impact. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84711 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-09-23 | 9.9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. The Project SCM branch and SCM refspec fields are accepted without rejecting values that begin with a dash and are passed to the git module during project synchronization, where they reach a `git checkout`/`git fetch` command line as bare arguments with no end-of-options separator. An authenticated user permitted to create or edit a project can set the SCM branch to a git option such as `--pathspec-from-file=<path>`, causing git to read an arbitrary file on the synchronization host and reflect its contents back through the project-update output. Because project synchronization runs on the control-plane host on default OpenShift Operator deployments, an attacker can read the control-plane Kubernetes ServiceAccount token, the Controller SECRET_KEY, and the database credentials, leading to full compromise of the Automation Platform and its Kubernetes namespace. System administrator privileges are not required and the impact crosses tenants. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93676 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-09-22 | 3.2 Low |
| xdg-dbus-proxy incorrectly filters D-Bus broadcast messages, bypassing configured path, interface, and member restrictions. This allows a sandboxed Flatpak application to intercept broadcast signals on the D-Bus session bus and AT-SPI bus that should be restricted, potentially exposing sensitive information to unauthorized applications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87766 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images, Hummingbird | 2026-09-22 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in bubblewrap. During sandbox setup, creating files or directories under the new root can follow a parent symlink onto the host via /oldroot, writing attacker-chosen paths outside the sandbox as the launching user. This happens before the sandboxed process starts. This issue is GHSA-pxhw-h44j-8pfx. It is fixed in bubblewrap 0.12.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18508 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Tar, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-09-22 | 4.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GNU tar. When extracting an archive with the --one-top-level option, hardlink targets are not confined to the designated top-level directory and may resolve relative to the extraction working directory. A crafted archive can create hardlinks that escape the intended boundary and, when combined with a preexisting symbolic link under the working directory, may allow writing outside that boundary during a single extraction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18477 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Tar, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-09-22 | 4.4 Medium |
| A TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) vulnerability in GNU tar's incremental dumpdir 'X' rename handling allows a local attacker with write access to a directory being backed up to influence the restore process if the attacker has access to the system where the restore is being performed. During restoration, files or directories may be created, renamed or overwritten outside the intended extraction directory. This could lead to unauthorized file modification or, in some cases, privilege escalation. Exploitation does not require the attacker to modify or craft the archive, and standard backup and restore workflows—including extracting into a newly created directory without using the -P option do not mitigate the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5704 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 6 Tar, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2026-09-22 | 5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in tar. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious archive, leading to hidden file injection with fully attacker-controlled content. This bypasses pre-extraction inspection mechanisms, potentially allowing an attacker to introduce malicious files onto a system without detection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92599 | 2 Hapijs, Redhat | 2 Joi, Hummingbird | 2026-09-22 | 7.5 High |
| joi (npm package `joi`, hapi.js) versions >=17.2.0 <17.13.7 and >=18.0.0 <18.2.6 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service in the `Joi.string().isoDate()` validation rule. One of the regular expressions the rule applies to the input is unanchored, so a valid ISO date followed by a long run of fractional-second digits causes the regex engine to restart its search from every position in the string, yielding time proportional to the square of the input length (about 1.4 s for 64 KB of digits and about 22 s for 256 KB). A remote attacker who can supply a string to an isoDate validation can stall the application with a single request. Fixed in 17.13.7 and 18.2.6; as a workaround, cap the length of the string before it reaches joi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93492 | 2 Io.netty, Redhat | 21 Netty-codec-http2, Amq Broker, Amq Broker 7 and 18 more | 2026-09-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Netty's HTTP/2 HpackEncoder. A remote attacker can exploit this by sending HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames with a very large MAX_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE. This causes the HpackEncoder to store an excessive number of unique headers, leading to increased CPU usage and memory consumption, ultimately resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-59849 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 12 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux For Els and 9 more | 2026-09-22 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in libssh. Logic errors in automatic certificate-based public key authentication can cause libssh clients to loop indefinitely when configured certificates are missing or repeatedly rejected by a server, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59842 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 12 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux For Els and 9 more | 2026-09-22 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in libssh. During server-side GSSAPI key exchange, a client-supplied Curve25519 public key shorter than the expected length is copied without proper length validation, leading to an out-of-bounds heap read. This could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to disclose small amounts of server memory. | ||||