| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Apache CXF 2.5.x before 2.5.10, 2.6.x before CXF 2.6.7, and 2.7.x before CXF 2.7.4 does not verify that a specified cryptographic algorithm is allowed by the WS-SecurityPolicy AlgorithmSuite definition before decrypting, which allows remote attackers to force CXF to use weaker cryptographic algorithms than intended and makes it easier to decrypt communications, aka "XML Encryption backwards compatibility attack." |
| The XML digital signature functionality (xsec/dsig/DSIGReference.cpp) in Apache Santuario XML Security for C++ (aka xml-security-c) before 1.7.1 allows context-dependent attackers to reuse signatures and spoof arbitrary content via crafted Reference elements in the Signature, aka "XML Signature Bypass issue." |
| rhc-chk.rb in Red Hat OpenShift Origin before 1.1, when -d (debug mode) is used, outputs the password and other sensitive information in cleartext, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by including log files or Bugzilla reports in support channels. |
| The Crypto.Random.atfork function in PyCrypto before 2.6.1 does not properly reseed the pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) before allowing a child process to access it, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging a race condition in which a child process is created and accesses the PRNG within the same rate-limit period as another process. |
| The configuration file for the FastCGI PHP support for lighttpd before 1.4.28 on Debian GNU/Linux creates a socket file with a predictable name in /tmp, which allows local users to hijack the PHP control socket and perform unauthorized actions such as forcing the use of a different version of PHP via a symlink attack or a race condition. |
| Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect before 1.1.7, and NetConnect, does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof portal servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. |
| Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, does not ensure that the UI labels unencrypted messages as unencrypted, which might make it easier for remote attackers to spoof details of a message's origin or interfere with encryption-policy auditing via an e-mail message to a queue's address. |
| Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, allows remote attackers to configure encryption or signing for certain outbound e-mail, and possibly cause a denial of service (loss of e-mail readability), via an e-mail message to a queue's address. |
| Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled with a "Sign by default" queue configuration, uses a queue's key for signing, which might allow remote attackers to spoof messages by leveraging the lack of authentication semantics. |
| In Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1, a system property is not properly encrypted. This may lead to a local user reading sensitive information from a properties file. |
|
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 could allow an attacker with physical access to the system to obtain highly sensitive information from system memory. IBM X-Force ID: 238053.
|
|
Communication between the client and the server application of the affected products is partially done using CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) over TCP/IP. This protocol is not encrypted and allows tracing of internal messages.
This issue affects
* FOXMAN-UN product: FOXMAN-UN R15B, FOXMAN-UN R15A, FOXMAN-UN R14B, FOXMAN-UN R14A, FOXMAN-UN R11B, FOXMAN-UN R11A, FOXMAN-UN R10C, FOXMAN-UN R9C;
* UNEM product: UNEM R15B, UNEM R15A, UNEM R14B, UNEM R14A, UNEM R11B, UNEM R11A, UNEM R10C, UNEM R9C.
List of CPEs:
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R15B:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R15A:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R14B:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R14A:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R11B:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R11A:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R10C:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R9C:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R15B:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R15A:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R14B:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R14A:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R11B:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R11A:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R10C:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
* cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R9C:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 225232.
|
| Unproper laxist permissions on the temporary files used by MIME4J TempFileStorageProvider may lead to information disclosure to other local users. This issue affects Apache James MIME4J version 0.8.8 and prior versions.
We recommend users to upgrade to MIME4j version 0.8.9 or later.
|
| Sensitive Cookie in HTTPS Session Without 'Secure' Attribute in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.0. |
| Sensitive Cookie in HTTPS Session Without 'Secure' Attribute in GitHub repository pyload/pyload prior to 0.5.0b3.dev32. |
| There is no check to see if slot 0 is being uploaded from the device to the host. When using encrypted images this means the unencrypted firmware can be retrieved easily. |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Consumer Comanda Mobile up to 14.9.3.2/15.0.0.8. This affects an unknown part of the component Restaurant Order Handler. The manipulation of the argument Login/Password leads to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. The attack can only be initiated within the local network. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| NVIDIA BMC stores user passwords in an obfuscated form in a database accessible by the host. This may lead to a credentials exposure. |
| It was discovered by Elastic engineering that when elasticsearch-certutil CLI tool is used with the csr option in order to create a new Certificate Signing Requests, the associated private key that is generated is stored on disk unencrypted even if the --pass parameter is passed in the command invocation. |
