Export limit exceeded: 414288 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 414288 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (414288 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-99015 | 1 Linux | 2 Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-10-23 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sock: Serialize dead-device detachment Rebinding an HCI socket after its controller is unregistered can race monitor control replay and crash the kernel. hci_sock_bind() clears hci_pi(sk)->hdev and drops the device reference under only the socket lock, whereas send_monitor_control_replay() holds hci_sk_list.lock for reading. Replay can observe a non-NULL hdev, then bind can clear it and drop the last reference before create_monitor_ctrl_open() reads hdev->id. This can cause a NULL pointer dereference if the pointer is reloaded, or a use-after-free if the old pointer is retained. The kernel reported: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000068-0x000000000000006f] RIP: 0010:create_monitor_ctrl_open+0x579/0x800 Call Trace: hci_sock_bind+0xd96/0x1190 __sys_bind+0x166/0x200 __x64_sys_bind+0x6d/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xdd/0x4a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The same missing serialization lets hci_send_to_sock() select a socket for the old device and queue its frame after bind has detached the socket or installed a new binding. Take hci_sk_list.lock for writing when clearing the device pointer and resetting the socket state. This waits for existing replay and delivery readers to finish before detachment and prevents later readers from using the old binding. Keep hci_dev_put() outside the critical section because the final device release can sleep. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95719 | 2026-10-23 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| An arbitrary file deletion vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to cause a denial of service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to crash the system, preventing it from rebooting without manual intervention and disrupting normal operation of the affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95717 | 2026-10-23 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of AOS that could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to inject malicious scripts. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of another authenticated user's browser session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95716 | 2026-10-23 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| An authentication bypass in the PAPI protocol of AOS-10 allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to change the state of certain settings of a vulnerable system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95715 | 2026-10-23 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated command injection vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-10. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker with physical access to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95714 | 2026-10-23 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the API of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated adjacent attacker with high privileges to achieve remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95713 | 2026-10-23 | 7 High | ||
| An unauthenticated buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-8. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to disrupt the availability of the affected interface, along with limited access to or modification of some system data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95710 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-23 | 7.1 High |
| An unauthenticated buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of AOS-10 or AOS-8 and could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to conduct a denial of service attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to disrupt the availability of the affected system, with a limited impact to the integrity of the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95708 | 2026-10-23 | 7.2 High | ||
| Command injection vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to perform command injection. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79956 | 2026-10-23 | 7.2 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the CLI command handling of the AOS-8 web interface could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to run unauthorized commands on the system, potentially leading to system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79894 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-23 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the PAPI protocol of AOS-8. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to disrupt the availability of the affected interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79872 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-23 | 9.4 Critical |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of AOS that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by an unauthenticated remote attacker. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79865 | 2026-10-23 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| A memory corruption vulnerability in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to achieve remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79851 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-10 that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system, leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79850 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass existing authentication controls and run arbitrary commands on the underlying host. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79849 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against an affected AOS-8 instance. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79848 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks against an affected AOS-8 instance. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79847 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets to the affected interface. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79844 | 2026-10-23 | 10 Critical | ||
| Authentication bypass vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98735 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-23 | 4.7 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_core: Serialize ACL scheduling with channel deletion hci_chan_sent() selects a channel under RCU but drops the read lock before accessing chan->conn and returning the channel. The ACL and LE schedulers then use its packet queue and update its transmit counters without any protection against channel deletion. After TX selects a channel and releases RCU, a disconnect command timeout on the separate request workqueue can run hci_conn_failed() and l2cap_conn_del(). hci_chan_del() can then unlink the channel, complete synchronize_rcu(), purge its queue and free it before TX resumes. This causes use-after-free both in hci_chan_sent() and in its callers. KASAN reported: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hci_chan_sent+0x892/0x9b0 Workqueue: hci0 hci_tx_work Call Trace: hci_chan_sent+0x892/0x9b0 hci_tx_work+0x5e6/0xb70 Allocated by task 91: hci_chan_create+0xe3/0x350 l2cap_conn_add.part.0+0x12/0xa30 l2cap_chan_connect+0x110d/0x1b60 l2cap_sock_connect+0x310/0x530 Freed by task 99: hci_chan_del+0x11f/0x170 l2cap_conn_del+0x4f1/0x800 l2cap_connect_cfm+0x88c/0xd30 hci_conn_failed+0x150/0x250 hci_abort_conn_sync+0x3e3/0x800 hci_cmd_sync_run+0x7e/0xc0 hci_abort_conn+0x105/0x1f0 disconnect_sync+0x157/0x290 hci_cmd_sync_work+0x13c/0x290 Hold the existing device mutex across channel selection and transmission in both schedulers to serialize them with channel teardown. Keep timeout handling outside the critical sections because hci_link_tx_to() acquires the same mutex. This also permits the transmit path to sleep, unlike extending the RCU read-side critical section across packet submission. | ||||