Export limit exceeded: 419424 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419424 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (419424 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-96423 | 1 Wireshark | 1 Wireshark | 2026-11-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| X11 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.8 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service | ||||
| CVE-2026-96219 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 17 more | 2026-11-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Out-of-bounds write in Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95324 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-03 | 3.4 Low |
| Uninitialized resource in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-95308 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-03 | 3.4 Low |
| Integer overflow in Metrics in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-95293 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-03 | 4.7 Medium |
| Uninitialized resource in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-84595 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 2 more | 2026-11-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, visionOS 27. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84389 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2026-11-03 | 2.8 Low |
| A url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, FortiSIEM 7.4.1 through 7.4.2 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-84385 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortisoaron-premise, Fortisoarpaas | 2026-11-03 | 4.9 Medium |
| A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-82393 | 1 Pnpm | 1 Pnpm | 2026-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| pnpm is a package manager. Prior to 10.34.5 and 11.11.0, pnpm accepts a scoped path traversal in a tarball dependency's package.json manifest name because pnpm11/resolving/npm-resolver/src/pickPackage.ts rejects slash characters only for unscoped names. During pnpm install, the unvalidated name reaches raw path joins in pnpm11/installing/deps-resolver/src/resolvePeers.ts, pnpm11/installing/deps-resolver/src/index.ts, and pnpm11/deps/graph-builder/src/lockfileToDepGraph.ts, causing package extraction outside node_modules and allowing attacker-controlled files to overwrite arbitrary filesystem paths even when --ignore-scripts is used. The overwrite can replace shell startup files, Git hooks, or installed package code and lead to code execution. This issue is fixed in versions 10.34.5, and 11.11.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81623 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-11-03 | 6.3 Medium |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with low user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81049 | 1 Dell | 40 Latitude 3330, Latitude 3420, Latitude 3440 and 37 more | 2026-11-03 | 4.4 Medium |
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2616, contain a Missing Support for Integrity Check vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7769 | 1 Ibm | 2 Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway | 2026-11-03 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_2, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_2, and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.0_1 and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_2, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_2, and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.0_1 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7363 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-11-03 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Canvas in Google Chrome on Linux, ChromeOS prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-79986 | 1 Apache | 2 Apache Camel, Camel | 2026-11-03 | 7.4 High |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure Files component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The Camel remote-file consumers poll a directory on a remote server and build the absolute remote path of each file by concatenating the configured directory with the file name reported in the server's directory listing. That concatenation (FtpUtils.absoluteFilePath and GenericFileConsumer) applied no lexical normalization and no check that the result stayed inside the directory being polled, and the resulting path became the operand for every subsequent remote operation on the file: retrieval (FtpOperations.retrieveFile / SftpOperations, reached from GenericFileConsumer where the retrieve name is taken verbatim from GenericFile.getAbsoluteFilePath), deletion when delete=true (GenericFileDeleteProcessStrategy), and renaming when move, preMove, moveFailed or readLock=rename is configured (GenericFileProcessStrategySupport and GenericFileRenameExclusiveReadLockStrategy). Neither isValidFile nor isMatched performed any containment check. A listing entry that is not a single path segment therefore resolved to a path outside the configured polling directory, causing Camel to read, delete or rename files outside it using the endpoint's own credentials. A listing name is not route-controlled data. It is supplied by the remote server, and the FTP control channel carries no integrity protection at all, so an on-path attacker can rewrite a LIST response without holding any credentials; a compromised, malicious or multi-tenant server, or a server backed by a virtual filesystem, can emit such a name directly. Retrieval is reachable in a default consumer configuration, since the remote consumers download every listed file; deletion and renaming additionally require one of the disposition options above, all of which are common. Escape from the directory Camel was configured to poll is unconditional, while escape from the server's own account boundary additionally depends on whether that server confines the account. The jailStartingDirectory option, which is documented as restricting Camel to the starting directory and is enabled by default, governed producer writes and, since the localWorkDirectory containment work, consumer downloads to the local work directory - but it did not constrain this remote operand, so its name and description claimed a boundary that was not enforced here. The same entry point had already been recognised on the local side: the localWorkDirectory download path was constrained so that a remote file name containing parent-directory segments could not resolve outside the local work directory. The remote operand was the remaining half of that surface. This artifact provides the azure-files scheme. Its consumer derives from the same RemoteFileConsumer base class and composed the remote path through a plain concatenation helper, so it inherited the same unconstrained resolution. Reaching it requires a listing name that is not a single path segment, which the Azure Files REST service does not normally return; the exposure was corrected on the same basis as the other remote-file consumers rather than from a demonstrated proof of concept against this scheme. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream reached end of life and does not receive this fix; users on it should move to a supported releases stream. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79633 | 2 Apache, Apache Software Foundation | 2 Answer, Apache Answer | 2026-11-03 | 8.1 High |
| vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.2. Missing authorization checks allowed authenticated users to perform actions on non-public content they were not permitted to access. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.3, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79624 | 2 Apache, Apache Software Foundation | 2 Answer, Apache Answer | 2026-11-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Insufficient session expiration vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.2. Insufficient session invalidation allowed revoked users to continue accessing known private uploaded files with a stale visit token. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.3, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79620 | 2 Apache, Apache Software Foundation | 2 Answer, Apache Answer | 2026-11-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| Exposure of sensitive information through data queries vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.2. An improper authorization check in the similar-question search allowed authenticated users to view metadata of non-public questions. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.3, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79613 | 2 Apache, Apache Software Foundation | 2 Answer, Apache Answer | 2026-11-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.2. Unauthenticated attackers could access comments associated with non-public content through public user profiles. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.3, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76994 | 2 Apache, Apache Software Foundation | 2 Answer, Apache Answer | 2026-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.2. Unauthenticated attackers could obtain metadata associated with hidden questions through public answer profiles. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.3, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75034 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-11-03 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Rancher Manager. The SAML assertion replay protection introduced by the fix for CVE-2026-44946 recorded consumed assertion IDs in a per-process cache, so each replica only detected replays that reached the same pod. In a high-availability deployment, an attacker holding a captured assertion could replay it once against every other replica to obtain additional authenticated sessions as the victim. This issue affects Rancher: before 2.15.1. | ||||