Export limit exceeded: 403660 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403660 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403660 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-104079 | 2026-10-09 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Envira Gallery Lite before 1.16.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in its gallery conversion REST endpoint that allows lower-privileged authenticated users to create and publish Envira galleries without the required capabilities, because the endpoint only checks edit permissions on the source post and uses a hard-coded publish status. Attackers can also supply arbitrary caller-controlled image IDs without ownership verification to publish unauthorized content using attachments they are not authorized to use. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96393 | 1 Canva | 1 Affinity | 2026-10-09 | 3.6 Low |
| The Affinity by Canva app before 3.3.1 (October 2026 release) did not perform adequate bounds checking when parsing Affinity document files, leading to an out-of-bounds pointer dereference. A threat actor could craft an Affinity document that, when opened by a user in Affinity, could result in an application crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96394 | 1 Canva | 1 Affinity | 2026-10-09 | 2.9 Low |
| The Affinity by Canva application for macOS before 3.3.1 (October 2026 release) did not validate image dimensions against the size of the pixel data when generating QuickLook thumbnails and previews of Affinity document files, leading to an out-of-bounds heap read. A threat actor could craft an Affinity document that, when displayed or previewed by a user in Finder, could disclose the contents of adjacent heap memory in the rendered thumbnail or preview image, or cause the thumbnail or preview extension to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101094 | 1 Canva | 1 Affinity | 2026-10-09 | 3.6 Low |
| The Affinity by Canva application before 3.3.1 (October 2026 release) did not correctly handle incomplete UTF-8 character sequences when parsing text in Affinity document files, leading to a heap buffer over-read. A threat actor could craft an Affinity document that, when opened by a user in Affinity, could disclose the contents of adjacent heap memory in the document's text or result in an application crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108063 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-09 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libhangul. When parsing Hanja dictionary files, the library fails to verify that an entry contains a valid value alongside its key. By providing a specially crafted dictionary file to an application that queries it, an attacker can trigger an unexpected application crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-92085 | 2026-10-09 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in TMT Machinery Industry and Trade Co. Ltd. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: before V16.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103006 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to Denial of Service via a specially crafted, deeply nested request submitted to the aggregation feature of the search API. Elasticsearch contains an uncontrolled recursion weakness in its search aggregation processing. An authenticated user with read access to a single index can submit a specially crafted request containing deeply nested aggregation definitions. Processing this request triggers unbounded recursive execution that exhausts the server process's available resources, causing the affected node to terminate. The node does not recover automatically and requires manual intervention to restore service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103007 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-09 | 7.2 High |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Elasticsearch can lead to Privilege Escalation via a delegated administrative privilege whose scope is not fully enforced during authorization checks. Elasticsearch contains an incorrect authorization weakness in a configurable, non-default privilege that lets an administrator delegate limited role-management capability to another user, scoped to specific indices. The authorization check that enforces this scoping does not correctly account for a role-definition setting that can expand the matched index set. A user holding this delegated privilege with a broadly-scoped index pattern can exploit this inconsistency by updating their own assigned role to gain access to indices that should remain restricted, including internal security data. This can enable further escalation up to full administrative control of the cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100833 | 1 Edgelesssys | 1 Contrast | 2026-10-09 | 9.6 Critical |
| Contrast (edgelesssys/contrast) versions 1.14.0 before 1.23.1 generate runtime policies that fail to detect all container image substitutions. A bad rebase during a Kata Containers update accidentally introduced an `allow_storage` rule that accepts storage entries using the `image_guest_pull` driver without verifying the image digest. An attacker with access to the Kata agent API — for example, a Kubernetes cluster administrator in Contrast's threat model — can therefore substitute a container image with an exploit payload, provided the substituted image satisfies the remaining policy rules, undermining the confidential container's integrity guarantees. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103008 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to Denial of Service via a specially crafted request that causes the server to construct and process a deeply nested data structure with no bound on recursion depth. Elasticsearch contains an uncontrolled recursion weakness in how it builds and serializes geometry values produced by scripted runtime fields. Unlike geometry supplied as text, which is subject to a nesting-depth limit, geometry constructed from a script's output is not bounded. An authenticated user with read access to a single index can submit a request defining such a field with a script that produces a deeply nested structure. Processing this request recurses past the available stack space, causing the affected node to terminate. The node does not recover automatically on all deployments and may require manual intervention to restore service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107406 | 1 Netscaler | 2 Adc, Gateway | 2026-10-09 | N/A |
| Memory overflow vulnerability leading to Remote Code Execution or Denial of Service Vulnerability in NetScaler ADC. NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway must be configured as a SAML SP or SAML IdP, subject to the following version-specific requirements: * For the following versions: Applicable only when configured as a SAML IdP: * NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway between 14.1-73.37 and 14.1-73.41, inclusive * NetScaler ADC 14.1-FIPS between 14.1-73.37 FIPS and 14.1-73.41 FIPS, inclusive * NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway between 13.1-64.23 and 13.1-64.28, inclusive * NetScaler ADC 13.1-FIPS between 13.1-NDcPP 13.1-37.279 and 13.1- 37.282, inclusive For the following versions: Applicable only when configured as a SAML SP or SAML IdP: * NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway before 14.1-73.37 * NetScaler ADC 14.1-FIPS before 14.1-73.37 FIPS * NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway before 13.1-64.23 * NetScaler ADC 13.1-FIPS before13.1-NDcPP 13.1-37.279 | ||||
| CVE-2026-107785 | 2026-10-09 | N/A | ||
| Crux Agent from 1.9.0 before 2.0.3 uses the full SKA bilocation key as the WireGuard preshared key. When a peering session negotiates use of SHA-512, the key produced is 64 bytes instead of the 32 bytes WireGuard requires. The agent does not validate this size; instead it attempts to use the `wg set` command to update the live tunnel, and write the invalid key to the WireGuard configuration file. The update fails, so the live tunnel keeps using its previous preshared key until the tunnel is shut down. The tunnel will fail to start when restarted. For a peer which has never successfully negotiated a 32-byte bilocation key in a Crux C2 organization which has the "Enforce SKA Use" setting turned off, no preshared key will be set for the tunnel. Therefore, an attacker who is able to intercept and store the peer's traffic, and has access (or will have access) to a cryptographically relevant quantum computer, will be able to decrypt the tunnel. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62026 | 2026-10-09 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MIGHTYminnow Dashboard Notes dashboard-notes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Dashboard Notes: from n/a through 1.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103009 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-10-09 | 7.1 High |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Elasticsearch can lead to Information Disclosure via a specially crafted cross-cluster search request that references an unauthorized shard identifier. Elasticsearch contains an authorization bypass weakness in its handling of cross-cluster search requests made through the Remote Cluster Security (RCS) 2.0 model. An authorization check validates a request against one identifying attribute of the target shard, while a separate, independently-supplied identifying attribute in the same request determines which shard is actually accessed. A holder of a cross-cluster API key authorized for one index can craft a request whose two identifying attributes refer to different indices, causing the request to be authorized against an index they can access while actually operating against a different, unauthorized index. This can expose that index's document contents, field mappings, and other metadata, and in limited cases allows modification of retention-lease state on the unauthorized index. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76459 | 2026-10-09 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco NX-OS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76459 are related to out-of-bounds write issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-787. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105827 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105826 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105825 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105824 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-10-09 | 5.9 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105823 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-10-09 | 4.0 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||