| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Fork-PR Actions task can read a third private repository via the collaborative-owner branch (missing fork-PR guard) |
| When using Google Secrets Manager as a backend for the Spring Cloud Config server a client can craft a request to the config server potentially exposing secrets from unintended GCP projects.
Spring Cloud Config 3.1.x: affected from 3.1.0 through 3.1.13 (inclusive); upgrade to 3.1.14 or greater (Enterprise Support Only). Spring Cloud Config 4.1.x: affected from 4.1.0 through 4.1.9 (inclusive); upgrade to 4.1.10 or greater (Enterprise Support Only). Spring Cloud Config 4.2.x: affected from 4.2.0 through 4.2.6 (inclusive); upgrade to 4.2.7 or greater (Enterprise Support Only). Spring Cloud Config 4.3.x: affected from 4.3.0 through 4.3.2 (inclusive); upgrade to 4.3.3 or greater. Spring Cloud Config 5.0.x: affected from 5.0.0 through 5.0.2 (inclusive); upgrade to 5.0.3 or greater. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: libwx: fix VF illegal register access
Register WX_CFG_PORT_ST is a PF restricted register. When a VF is
initialized, attempting to read this register triggers an illegal
register access, which lead to a system hang.
When the device is VF, the bus function ID can be obtained directly from
the PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn). |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows SMB Client allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| ColdFusion is affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Numeric truncation error in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| In Teltonika Networks RUTOS devices, a vulnerability exists in modbusgwd
due to improper handling of Modbus TCP request data. A remote,
unauthenticated attacker with access to the affected service could
trigger a heap-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows MIDI Service Module allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Autel Maxi Charger Single firmware through V1.03.51 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in the set_ap_param command handled by the /localcfg endpoint. An authenticated attacker can supply oversized input, resulting in denial of service and potentially arbitrary code execution. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow for the Intel(R) Open Volume Kernel Library (Intel(R) Open VKL) library maintained by intel(R) before version 2.0.2 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. System software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
