| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Session fixation vulnerability in the Workplace (aka WP) component in IBM FileNet P8 Application Engine (P8AE) 4.0.2.x before 4.0.2.7-P8AE-FP007 allows remote attackers to hijack web sessions via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Workplace (aka WP) component in IBM FileNet P8 Application Engine (P8AE) 3.5.1 before 3.5.1-021 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| Open redirect vulnerability in the Workplace (aka WP) component in IBM FileNet P8 Application Engine (P8AE) 3.5.1 before 3.5.1-021 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| IBM DB2 9.7 before FP3 does not perform the expected drops or invalidations of dependent functions upon a loss of privileges by the functions' owners, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via calls to these functions, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3471. |
| IBM DB2 9.7 before FP3 does not properly enforce privilege requirements for execution of entries in the dynamic SQL cache, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the cache to execute an UPDATE statement contained in a compiled compound SQL statement. |
| The FXCLI_OraBR_Exec_Command function in FastBackServer.exe in the Server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 5.5.0.0 through 5.5.6.0 and 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.1 uses values of packet fields to determine the content and length of data copied to memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2010-3059. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Rendition Engine (aka P8RE) 4.0.1 through 4.5.1 in IBM FileNet P8 Content Manager (CM) allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors. |
| IBM FileNet P8 Content Engine (aka P8CE) 4.0.1 through 5.0.0, as used in FileNet P8 Content Manager (CM) and FileNet P8 Business Process Manager (BPM), does not require the PRIVILEGED_WRITE access role for all intended Object Store modifications, which allows remote attackers to change a privileged property of an object via unspecified vectors. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the server process in ibmslapd.exe in IBM Tivoli Directory Server (TDS) 5.2 before 5.2.0.5-TIV-ITDS-IF0010, 6.0 before 6.0.0.67 (aka 6.0.0.8-TIV-ITDS-IF0009), 6.1 before 6.1.0.40 (aka 6.1.0.5-TIV-ITDS-IF0003), 6.2 before 6.2.0.16 (aka 6.2.0.3-TIV-ITDS-IF0002), and 6.3 before 6.3.0.3 (aka 6.3.0.0-TIV-ITDS-IF0003) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted LDAP request. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| The ActiveBar1 ActiveX control in the Data Dynamics ActiveBar ActiveX controls, as distributed in ActBar.ocx 1.0.6.5 in IBM Rational System Architect 11.4.0.2, 11.4.0.1, and earlier, does not properly restrict the SetLayoutData method, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Data argument, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-3883. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| IBM solidDB 4.5.x before 4.5.182, 6.0.x before 6.0.1069, 6.1.x and 6.3.x before 6.3 FP8 (aka 6.3.49), and 6.5.x before 6.5 FP4 (aka 6.5.0.4) does not properly handle the (1) rpc_test_svc_readwrite and (2) rpc_test_svc_done commands, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a crafted command. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.39 and 7.0 before 7.0.0.17 uses a weak WS-Security XML encryption algorithm, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain plaintext data from a (1) JAX-RPC or (2) JAX-WS Web Services request via unspecified vectors related to a "decryption attack." |
| Integer underflow in lzhsr.dll in Autonomy KeyView, as used in IBM Lotus Notes before 8.5.2 FP3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted header in a .lzh attachment that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow, aka SPR PRAD88MJ2W. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in rtfsr.dll in Autonomy KeyView, as used in IBM Lotus Notes before 8.5.2 FP3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted link in a .rtf attachment, aka SPR PRAD8823JQ. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in mw8sr.dll in Autonomy KeyView, as used in IBM Lotus Notes before 8.5.2 FP3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted link in a Microsoft Office document attachment, aka SPR PRAD8823ND. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in assr.dll in Autonomy KeyView, as used in IBM Lotus Notes before 8.5.2 FP3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted tag data in an Applix spreadsheet attachment, aka SPR PRAD8823A7. |
| The Security component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1.0.x before 6.1.0.35 and 7.x before 7.0.0.15 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by using a Lightweight Third-Party Authentication (LTPA) token for authentication. |
| The Security component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1.0.x before 6.1.0.35 and 7.x before 7.0.0.15, when the Tivoli Integrated Portal / embedded WebSphere Application Server (TIP/eWAS) framework is used, does not properly delete AuthCache entries upon a logout, which might allow remote attackers to access the server by leveraging an unattended workstation. |
| The AuthCache purge implementation in the Security component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1.0.x before 6.1.0.37 and 7.x before 7.0.0.15 does not purge a user from the PlatformCredential cache, which might allow remote authenticated users to gain privileges by leveraging a group membership specified in an old RACF Object (aka RACO). |
| The SOAP with Attachments API for Java (SAAJ) implementation in the Web Services component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1.0.x before 6.1.0.37 and 7.x before 7.0.0.15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via encrypted SOAP messages. |
