Export limit exceeded: 409245 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (105386 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-13046 | 1 Watchguard | 2 Fireware, Fireware Os | 2026-10-08 | 7.2 High |
| A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS's SAML single sign-on session handling (samld) allows an attacker who has already obtained the ability to write files on the appliance to execute arbitrary code in the context of the samld service by causing samld to load a maliciously crafted session file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18145 | 1 Watchguard | 2 Fireware, Fireware Os | 2026-10-08 | 7.2 High |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the spamBlocker (spamd) service of WatchGuard Fireware OS allows an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to crash the service or potentially execute arbitrary code by sending a specially crafted management request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90979 | 1 Apache | 1 Karaf | 2026-10-08 | 7.3 High |
| LDAPCache and LDAPBackingEngine build LDAP search filters for user lookup and role lookup by textually substituting the placeholders %u, %dn, and %fqdn (drawn from the login name, the resolved user DN, and its fully qualified namespace form) into administrator-configured filter templates (userFilter, roleFilter). Before the fix, the only sanitization applied to the substituted value was double backslashed: filter = filter.replaceAll(Pattern.quote("%u"), Matcher.quoteReplacement(user)); filter = filter.replace("\\", "\\\\"); This does not escape the other characters RFC 4515 requires escaping in an LDAP search filter: *, (, ), and NUL. A login name containing any of these can change the structure of the resulting filter rather than being matched as a literal value (e.g. a crafted username can turn an equality match into a wildcard match, or close/reopen filter clauses), widening what the search returns and potentially causing a login or role lookup to match an LDAP entry other than the intended one, over-granting roles, and depending on deployment-specific filter templates, potentially affecting which account a login resolved to. It's not exploitable through every entry points: LDAPLoginModule and LDAPPubkeyLoginModule both called Util.doRFC2254Encoding() (correct RFC 4515 escaping) on the login name before handing it to LDAPCache, which masked the missing escaping in LDAPCache for those two call paths. Using LDAPCache directly (bypassing the login modules) does not reproduce through the normal LDAPLoginModule/LDAPPubkeyLoginModule authentication flow for this reason. It does reproduce through two other call paths that reach LDAPCache/LDAPBackingEngine without any prior escaping: * GSSAPILdapLoginModule passes the NameCallback name straight through, unescaped. * LDAPBackingEngine (listRoles) passes principal.getName() straight through, unescaped. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91006 | 1 Apache | 1 Karaf | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| Apache Karaf's instance-management service (InstanceServiceImpl) builds the command line used to launch a child Karaf JVM by string concatenation, then executes it through /bin/sh (Unix) or cscript (Windows). The caller-supplied javaOpts value is spliced into that string unquoted. A javaOpts value containing shell metacharacters (;, |, `, $(...)) is interpreted by the shell instead of being passed to the JVM as an option, giving arbitrary OS command execution as the Karaf process user. Reachable via the shell commands instance:create, instance:start, instance:restart, instance:change-opts, and the equivalent InstanceMBean JMX operations (createInstance, startInstance, changeJavaOpts, cloneInstance). Mitigation * Set karaf.secured.command.compulsory.roles=admin in etc/system.properties to close the fail-open gap for all unconfigured command scopes. * Restrict which principals can reach instance:* commands and InstancesMBean via etc/users.properties role assignments. * Treat javaOpts passed to instance:create/instance:start/instance:change-opts/InstancesMBean as untrusted input only from fully-trusted operators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104714 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') vulnerability in Apache Struts. Where a localized message formats a date or time argument, the formatter retained for that message by the application-wide text provider is used by concurrently served requests without isolation, so a value belonging to one user can appear in another user's response, or the rendering can fail and surface as a server error. Applications whose localized messages format no date or time arguments are not affected. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 through 2.3.37, from 2.5.0 through 2.5.33, from 6.0.0 through 6.11.0, from 7.0.0 through 7.3.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.12.0 or 7.4.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87902 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| An unauthenticated attacker can make `get_page_template()` page-template resolution include a chosen readable local `.php` file outside the active theme directories. If relevant pre-conditions for both the server and the active theme are met, this can lead to RCE. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104712 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| Asymmetric resource consumption (amplification) vulnerability in Apache Struts. When a request parameter is bound to an arbitrary-precision decimal (java.math.BigDecimal) property that is then rendered through the Struts tag library, the framework can produce a response many orders of magnitude larger than the request, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust server CPU and outbound network capacity with sustained low-volume traffic. Applications that do not bind request parameters to BigDecimal properties, or never render such a property through the Struts tag library, are not affected. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.5.14 through 2.5.33, from 6.0.0 through 6.11.0, from 7.0.0 through 7.3.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.12.0 or 7.4.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42617 | 1 Tuxera | 1 Ntfs-3g | 2026-10-08 | 7.1 High |
| In NTFS-3G before 2026.7.7, a heap buffer overflow exists in ntfs_ir_to_ib() in index.c that allows an attacker to corrupt heap memory in the SUID-root ntfs-3g binary by crafting a malicious NTFS image. The overflow is triggered by extending a directory, e.g., by creating a file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42618 | 1 Tuxera | 1 Ntfs-3g | 2026-10-08 | 7.1 High |
| In NTFS-3G before 2026.7.7, a heap buffer overflow exists in ntfs_decompress() in compress.c that allows an attacker to corrupt one byte of heap memory in the SUID-root ntfs-3g binary by crafting a malicious NTFS image. The overflow is triggered by reading the special crafted file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46572 | 1 Tuxera | 1 Ntfs-3g | 2026-10-08 | 7.4 High |
| In NTFS-3G before 2026.7.7, a heap buffer overflow exists in ntfs_ib_cut_tail() in libntfs-3g/index.c that allows an attacker to corrupt heap memory in the SUID-root ntfs-3g binary by crafting a malicious NTFS image. The overflow is triggered by creating a file in a specially crafted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46570 | 1 Tuxera | 1 Ntfs-3g | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| In NTFS-3G before 2026.7.7, a heap buffer overflow exists in ntfs_index_walk_down() in libntfs-3g/index.c that allows an attacker to corrupt heap memory in the SUID-root ntfs-3g binary by crafting a malicious NTFS image. The overflow is triggered by reading the special crafted file metadata. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106611 | 2026-10-08 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPMU DEV Forminator forminator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Forminator: from n/a through 1.57.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107322 | 1 Aws | 1 Databases-on-aws | 2026-10-08 | 7.8 High |
| An incomplete list of disallowed inputs in Amazon Agent Plugins for AWS databases-on-aws plugin before 1.7.1 might allow a remote unauthenticated actor to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the host running the helper via a crafted database command value introduced in the agent context. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to databases-on-aws plugin version 1.7.1 or later and verify that the updated plugin is active in each environment where it is used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50054 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Zimbra Collaboration Suite | 2026-10-08 | 7.1 High |
| An authorization flaw in Zimbra Collaboration Suite’s GrantRightsRequest allows an attacker with access to an authenticated account to grant another local account the loginAs right, creating persistent mailbox access and mail-sending authority that survives password changes and session expiry. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93443 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93675 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an expected dependency confusion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93449 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93447 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow an attacker with access to the server secret and Redis write access to submit a malicious serialized cache value. When the value was retrieved, deserialization could have executed attacker-controlled code with the privileges of the service process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93445 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88962 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation. | ||||