Export limit exceeded: 408316 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10893 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-25170 | 2 Docebo, Spaghettilearning | 2 Docebolms, Docebolms | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| DoceboLMS 1.2 contains an SQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to manipulate database queries by injecting SQL code through the id, idC, and idU parameters. Attackers can send GET requests to the lesson.php endpoint with malicious SQL payloads to extract sensitive database information. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7263 | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High | ||
| Some Huawei home music system products have a path traversal vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause unauthorized file deletion or file permission change.(Vulnerability ID:HWPSIRT-2023-53450) This vulnerability has been assigned a (CVE)ID:CVE-2023-7263 | ||||
| CVE-2023-7300 | 2026-04-15 | 8 High | ||
| Huawei Home Music System has a path traversal vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause the music host file to be deleted or the file permission to be changed.(Vulnerability ID:HWPSIRT-2023-60613) | ||||
| CVE-2024-3798 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Insecure handling of GET header parameter file included in requests being sent to an instance of the open-source project Phoniebox allows an attacker to create a website, which – when visited by a user – will send malicious requests to multiple hosts on the local network. If such a request reaches the server, it will cause one of the following (depending on the chosen payload): shell command execution, reflected XSS or cross-site request forgery. This issue affects Phoniebox in all releases through 2.7. Newer 2.x releases were not tested, but they might also be vulnerable. Phoniebox in version 3.0 and higher are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37941 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Internal Link Juicer Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress.This issue affects Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress: from n/a through 2.24.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37940 | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium).This issue affects Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium): from n/a through 2.21.13. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37939 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VolThemes Patricia Lite.This issue affects Patricia Lite: from n/a through 1.2.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4375 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sparx Systems Pro Cloud Server allows Cross-Site Request Forgery to perform Session Hijacking. Cross-Site Request Forgery is present at the whole application but it can be used to change the Pro Cloud Server Configuration password. This issue affects Pro Cloud Server: earlier than 6.0.165. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13432 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Webcamconsult plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37758 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Improper access control in the endpoint /RoleMenuMapping/AddRoleMenu of Digiteam v4.21.0.0 allows authenticated attackers to escalate privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13444 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The wp-greet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7402 | 1 Netskope | 1 Netskope | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Netskope has identified a potential gap in its agent (Netskope Client) in which a malicious insider can potentially tamper the Netskope Client configuration by performing MITM (Man-in-the-Middle) activity on the Netskope Client communication channel. A successful exploitation would require administrative privileges on the machine, and could result in temporarily altering the configuration of Netskope Client or permanently disabling or removing the agent from the machine. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7422 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Theme My Login plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the tml_admin_save_ms_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the theme's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Please note that this only affects multi-site instances. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50738 | 1 Lexmark | 1 Printer Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A new feature to prevent Firmware downgrades was recently added to some Lexmark products. A method to override this downgrade protection has been identified. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50923 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic." | ||||
| CVE-2023-51416 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EnvialoSimple EnvíaloSimple.This issue affects EnvíaloSimple: from n/a through 2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8489 | 1 Modelscope | 1 Agentscope | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in modelscope/agentscope, specifically in the AgentScope Studio backend server, allows for Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to overly permissive CORS headers. This issue affects the latest commit on the main branch (21161fe). The vulnerability permits an attacker to access all backend endpoints, including the `api/file` endpoint, enabling the reading of arbitrary files on the target's local file system through CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47800 | 1 B2evolution | 2 B2evolution, B2evolution Cms | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| b2evolution 7.2.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify admin account details without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form to submit unauthorized changes to user profiles by tricking victims into loading a specially crafted webpage. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3932 | 1 Totara | 1 Enterprise Lms | 2026-04-15 | 3.1 Low |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Totara LMS up to 18.7. This affects an unknown part of the component User Selector. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 13.46, 14.38, 15.33, 16.27, 17.21 and 18.8 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39163 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| binux pyspider up to v0.3.10 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Flask endpoints. | ||||