Export limit exceeded: 403484 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9364 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-56344 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cognos Analytics | 2026-09-19 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 12.0.4 through 12.0.4 FP2, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.3 FP1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84241 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84239 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 7.6 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84108 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84105 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 7.7 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84089 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 7.8 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84086 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 7.2 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84085 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10744 | 1 Ibm | 1 Mq For Hpe Nonstop | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High |
| IBM MQ for HPE NonStop 8.1.0 through 8.1.0.40 could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially escalate privileges due to an integer overflow in MQINQ request validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10858 | 1 Ibm | 1 Mq For Hpe Nonstop | 2026-09-18 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM MQ for HPE NonStop 8.1.0 through 8.1.0.40 could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code due to a heap buffer underflow when processing multi-segment messages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84106 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 8.9 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84084 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84077 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84071 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 7.2 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to OS command injection in the Universal Connector plugin upload functionality. A privileged authenticated attacker can provide a malicious filename that is incorporated into a shell command executed by the application, potentially resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84031 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 9 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82890 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13882 | 1 Ibm | 2 Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition, Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition | 2026-09-18 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.2, and 6.2.4.0 through 6.2.4.4 and IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition 6.2.4.0 through 6.2.4.4 could allow an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service in the email service due to improper control of interaction frequency. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14754 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-18 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36076 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cognos Analytics | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 12.1.0 through 12.1.3 FP1, and 12.0.4 through 12.0.4 FP2 stores sensitive information in source code could be used by an authenticated user in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81937 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 7.2 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the import remotelog_config file CLI command. A highly privileged authenticated user can inject shell commands through the filename parameter, potentially resulting in arbitrary command execution with root privileges and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. | ||||